The French president is exposed to two billion Muslims, and he wants to restructure Islam, as if it were a company, and supports the republishing of drawings that expose the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, and then the angry people are blamed, and anger is inherently unrestrained, and unfortunately there are no rules in it.
These issues, the hypocrisy of some of them for the sake of the president is not correct, because the Messenger honored a portion of him and those like him, and basically there is a colonial legacy of France and many countries, in the Arab and Islamic world, that led to the generation of sensitivities, and many do not forget the killing of millions of Algerians, Arabs and Muslims in Africa, and in this sense, the French president does not have the right or the luxury to demand the restructuring of Islam, or to attack the shrine of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace.
The vast majority of Muslims are not spiteful, and coexist with all cultures and nations, and there are millions of Muslims in France, Europe, and Western countries, and they got their rights, and they live in a way that preserves their dignity, after they fled from their oppressive Muslim countries and their systems, but this does not mean that anyone has the right, Touching the dignity of these people, and exposure to the large social and religious bloc to which they belong.
Freedom of expression differs from culture to culture, and if we go back to what was previously published in that publication of drawings that exposed the shrine of the Prophet, our Lord Jesus Christ, and his mother, we realize that their standard of freedom differs from our standard of freedom. We have social and religious controls before legal, but it is a condemned standard. His companions believe that it is sacred, and we must accept it without objection.
But wait, because freedom of expression ends when it affects others, and if we are fundamentally, clearly and honestly, against any terrorist act that took place in France or any country, then experts must analyze the causes of these operations, not in order to justify them, or search for legitimacy for them, Rather, let us know together that you cannot touch people in their belief, then you assume that they will smile, and thank you that you attacked their religion or belief, so that is an insult after another insult, with our assertion here, that we are not with any terrorism, the Messenger himself who was attacked repeatedly, did not He kills those who were exposed to him, but he practiced amnesty.
The French President is really ignorant, as he believes that he is capable of enmity against two billion Muslims, and at the same time he thinks that he has the right to attack their symbols, and also to ask these peoples not to boycott any French product, and to turn the compass so that the scene is not read from its foundation, even if Muslims are hostile to the West They hate him for what they migrated to in the first place, but the president and those like him are supposed to erase their religious and social identity, while France was originally to prevent touching the beliefs of others.
The West does not understand the Islamic world, and always asks why they hate us, and the question proves the level of ignorance, or insistence on ignoring, you are like a great power, when your legacy is colonial and bloody, and you also continue to attack the region politically, economically, religiously and socially, and you support the Israeli occupation, and you have other partners, and you do not You stop, then we do not hear your voice, except when a bloody reaction occurs, on the part of a sane or insane person, you will be the deranged if you do not understand the whole story from its roots, because you must stop your policies, so as not to be surprised by those whom we also consider irrational, or terrorists.
The status of the Prophet, yes, is a concern for those who harm him, and perhaps our defense of him must first be due to us Muslims following his morals. The blame is placed on us, because we get nervous when someone touches him, but we also neglect his morals.
Muslims who previously emigrated to the West were not harmed and were granted their rights, but it is clear that Western politicians do not understand that continuing to tamper with the region and insult religion and religious symbols is unacceptable, just as we reaffirm that we do not accept killing people in the name of revenge for religion, or in defense About the Messenger of God, because the angry reaction is used by the enemies of Islam to prove that it is a bloody religion.
Why do they hate us? The question is Western, and it is based on a wrong assumption. Basically, we never hate you. Just stop touching other people's beliefs, religion, region, and existence.
In religion, hypocrisy is not valid, nor is playing on the ropes.
Abu Al-Sanaqi International Cultural Association, President of the Association, Jaafar Al-Khabouri
